11.9 C
New York
Home Blog Page 185

Trump budget package in danger as it hits GOP opposition


Washington — House Republicans have yet to resolve several major disputes that threaten to derail President Trump’s domestic policy bill as more conservative members and blue-state Republicans dig in on their demands. 

House Speaker Mike Johnson remains committed to putting the legislation, which would extend tax cuts from Mr. Trump’s first term while temporarily enacting new ones, on the floor before Memorial Day. The tax measures, as well as increased spending on the military and border security, would be offset partly by cuts to Medicaid, food stamps and clean energy subsidies. 

But first, it will have to get through the House Budget Committee starting Friday, where a handful of conservatives have said the legislation does not go far enough to slash federal spending. Rep. Ralph Norman of South Carolina said Thursday that he and Rep. Chip Roy of Texas would vote against advancing the bill. 

“We’ve got a spending problem. We’ve got a deficit problem, and it doesn’t address that,” Norman said. 

Rep. Jodey Arrington of Texas, the Republican chairman of the Budget Committee, said he was confident there are enough votes to advance it when the committee meets Friday to merge the various parts of the reconciliation package that have been produced by other committees into a single bill. If it can get out of the Budget Committee, the plan is for the Rules Committee to meet Monday to tee it up for a floor vote later in the week. 

Meanwhile, a group of Republicans from blue states have threatened to withhold their support in a floor vote if the bill does not raise a cap on state and local taxes that can be written off on federal tax returns. The bill increases the cap on the deduction from $10,000 to $30,000, but several New York Republicans have insisted on raising it even further. 

Rep. Mike Lawler, a New York Republican, on Thursday called the cap “unacceptable” and said the group has made clear to leadership that “none of us are going to support that as it currently stands.” 

Among the demands conservative members have made are moving up the work requirements for Medicaid recipients without disabilities and children. The requirements would not set in until 2029 under the current bill and conservatives want them to kick in as soon as the legislation becomes law. 

House Majority Leader Steve Scalise, a Louisiana Republican, said Thursday that they are considering moving up the effective date for the work requirements to get more members on board with the final product, but added that the final details have not been worked out. 

Johnson, a Louisiana Republican, spent Thursday meeting with the opposing factions and said they would continue to negotiate through the weekend to resolve the remaining differences. He can afford just three defections, if all members are voting, in a floor vote. 

contributed to this report.



Source link

‘A young boy from Borivali …’: Akash Ambani congratulates Rohit Sharma on Wankhede stand honour | Cricket News



Officials fired by Trump challenge his power in appeals court : NPR


Merit Systems Protection Board member Cathy Harris (left) and National Labor Relations Board member Gwynne Wilcox (right) were fired by President Trump earlier this year. A panel of judges at the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals is weighing whether he had the authority to do so.

Merit Systems Protection Board member Cathy Harris (left) and National Labor Relations Board member Gwynne Wilcox (right) were fired by President Trump earlier this year.

Mike Scarcella/Reuters; FM Archive/Alamy stock photo


hide caption

toggle caption

Mike Scarcella/Reuters; FM Archive/Alamy stock photo

Appellate judges in Washington, D.C., will consider a key question on Friday: Does the president have the constitutional authority to fire board members at agencies created by Congress to be independent of the White House?

More specifically, did President Trump overstep when he removed National Labor Relations Board member Gwynne Wilcox and Merit Systems Protection Board member Cathy Harris from their positions without cause?

Already, lower court judges have said yes, citing a 1935 Supreme Court decision known as Humphrey’s Executor that upheld limits Congress placed on the president’s removal powers. The judges ordered Wilcox and Harris temporarily returned to their seats.

But the Trump administration appealed those decisions, arguing that the lower court judges erred in their interpretation of that 1935 decision and that they exceeded their authority in ordering reinstatement. After some back and forth involving emergency motions at the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals, the Supreme Court stepped in on April 9, with Chief Justice John Roberts issuing an order clearing the way for Wilcox and Harris to be removed again until the merits of their cases could be considered.

Of the three D.C. Circuit Court judges who will hear those merit arguments Friday, two are Trump appointees who — in this case and a related one — have supported the government’s stance that the Constitution gives Trump the power to control the executive branch as he sees fit. The third judge, a Biden appointee, sees it differently.

Agency independence at stake

At stake in this case are not just Wilcox and Harris’ jobs, but the jobs of people Trump has fired elsewhere in a similar fashion, including at the Federal Trade Commission and the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.

Congress created these “independent agencies” with some protections from political interference written into law. They are led by boards or commissions whose members are nominated by presidents and confirmed by the Senate.

Congress required that these boards or commissions be bipartisan, with Democratic and Republican members serving staggered terms. By law, the president can only fire members for cause, such as neglect of duty or malfeasance.

Now, the Trump administration says such restrictions are unconstitutional, while Congress has been largely silent on the issue.

“Article II of the U.S. Constitution vests the entire executive power in a single President, who alone is accountable to the people,” Trump wrote in his letter to Wilcox, terminating her.

Wilcox and Harris have warned that a ruling in the president’s favor would put the independence of other government boards, including the Federal Reserve, at risk. If the court finds that Trump has the constitutional authority to fire them, they warn, then nothing will stand in the way of his firing Fed Chair Jerome Powell, something Trump has threatened but recently said he had “no intention” of doing.

The Trump administration has tried to quell those fears, writing in court filings that the Federal Reserve is “a unique institution with a unique history and background,” affording it a degree of insulation from presidential control.

“That does not hold up,” wrote Harris’ attorneys in their reply. “There is no coherent way to create a special ‘Federal Reserve exception’ that cabins the destructive effects of the government’s theory.”

Competing interpretations of the Constitution

Wilcox and Harris have argued that overturning Humphrey’s Executor would create chaos. The Trump administration contends it is not trying to overturn the legal precedent.

Rather, the government’s attorneys have argued that Humphrey’s Executor does not apply to Wilcox and Harris given the “substantial executive power” that their agencies wield today — power the Trump administration says the Supreme Court did not consider 90 years ago.

The way the Trump administration lawyers describe it: The Constitution vests executive power — all of it — in the president. A court can’t force the president to retain someone he doesn’t trust to carry out his policies, they argue.

“Heads of agencies within the Executive Branch must share the objectives of my administration and its commitment to serving the will of the American people,” Trump wrote in his letter to Wilcox.

Wilcox’s attorneys call this an aggressive new interpretation of the Constitution. They’ve argued that the National Labor Relations Board’s powers — which include hearing appeals over labor disputes, issuing remedies, and making rules pertaining to how federal labor law is carried out — are not nearly as broad as the government makes them out to be, noting that the board must go to court to have its decisions enforced.

Harris’ attorneys, meanwhile, charge that the government is attempting to narrow Humphrey’s Executor “into oblivion” in arguing that it doesn’t apply to the Merit Systems Protection Board, which hears employment-related complaints brought by federal workers against their agencies.

“If this Board is not constitutional under Humphrey’s Executor, nothing is,” they write.



Source link

Polio outbreak in Papua New Guinea declared by World Health Organisation

0


The World Health Organisation has declared a polio outbreak in Papua New Guinea and called for an “immediate” vaccination campaign.

Samples of the highly infectious virus were found in two healthy children during a routine screening in Lae, a coastal city in the country’s north east.

Less than half of the country’s population are immunised against the potentially deadly disease, which is close to being wiped out but has recently resurfaced in some parts of the world.

“We have to do something about it and we have to do it immediately,” said Sevil Huseynova, WHO’s representative in Papua New Guinea, warning that the disease could spread beyond the country.

“We have to make maximum effort to get 100% [vaccination] coverage,” Dr Huseynova said at a media conference on Thursday.

“Polio knows no borders.”

The disease is caused by the poliovirus, which spreads through contact with an infected person’s faeces or droplets when they cough and sneeze.

It mostly affects children under five years old.

There is no cure for polio, although the majority of people with the infection – including the two recent cases in Papua New Guinea – have no symptoms. Those who do may get a flu-like illness.

A small number of people infected with polio – between one in a thousand and one in a hundred – develop more serious problems that can lead to paralysis. This is also when the disease becomes life-threatening, particularly when paralysis affects muscles used for breathing.

Papua New Guinea was said to be polio-free since 2000, until an outbreak in 2018, which was contained within the same year.

The latest cases were found to be carrying a virus strain genetically linked to one circulating in Indonesia. Papua New Guinea shares a border with Indonesia’s easternmost Papua province.

Health Minister Elias Kapavore has vowed to achieve 100% polio immunisation in the country by the end of this year.

“There is no excuse… Polio is a serious disease,” he said.

The ongoing campaign will target children aged 10 and below and is expected to reach around 3.5 million people.

“The battle on polio starts today,” the department wrote in a Facebook post yesterday.

The WHO, UN’s children agency Unicef and Australia’s government are supporting Papua New Guinea in its rollout of vaccines.

Unicef’s Papua New Guinea representative Veera Mendonca pointed out the disparity in vaccination coverage across the country – with coverage as low as 8% in some districts.

“That is not acceptable,” she said, adding that Unicef is working with churches and community leaders to encourage vaccination and to dispel any misinformation.

Polio has staged a comeback elsewhere in Asia in recent years. Pakistan saw 74 cases of the disease last year, while Afghanistan recorded 24 cases.

The WHO has also warned of an outbreak in war-torn Gaza after traces of the virus were found in wastewater.



Source link

Horoscopes Today, May 16, 2025


Here are the horoscopes for today, Friday, May 16, 2025.

For full daily and monthly horoscopes as well as expert readings, see our full Horoscopes experience.

What is your zodiac sign? A guide to what astrology can tell you about yourself

Get to know Taurus: Personality traits and more on this Zodiac sign

Taurus (April 20 – May 20)

Logically, you see your life unfolding from a practical perspective. But are there hidden desires that are not accounted for?

Read the full Taurus Daily Horoscope

Gemini (May 21 – June 21)

Want to be left alone with your thoughts? A reclusive mindset can stifle encounters with others during the Capricorn moon.

Read the full Gemini Daily Horoscope

Cancer (June 22 – July 22)

Friends have solid advice today. Struggling with a goal or career issue? Call on your network for help.

Read the full Cancer Daily Horoscope

Leo (July 23 – August 22)

Work priorities take precedence today. The Capricorn moon encourages an efficient and productive mindset. But where’s the fun in that?

Read the full Leo Daily Horoscope

Virgo (August 23 – September 22)

Creative ideas are flowing! Feeling the need to express yourself? The Capricorn moon initiates the start of a passion project.

Read the full Virgo Daily Horoscope

Libra (September 23 – October 22)

Sticking to your process? Structured approaches may get in the way of relating under the Capricorn moon. Give a little.

Read the full Libra Daily Horoscope

Scorpio (October 23 – November 21)

Work priorities can get out of balance today. Are you talking rather than doing? Be clear about your time constraints.

Read the full Scorpio Daily Horoscope

Sagittarius (November 22 – December 21)

Being strict with your money and routines? Cautiousness can frustrate passion projects and relationships during the Capricorn moon.

Read the full Sagittarius Daily Horoscope

Capricorn (December 21 – January 19)

You’re in your zone! But frustration in your personal life may derail your productive streak. Can you juggle the two?

Read the full Capricorn Daily Horoscope

Aquarius (January 20 – February 18)

Slow down for introspection today. The Capricorn moon offers deep reflections, but only if you can set social boundaries.

Read the full Aquarius Daily Horoscope

Pisces (February 19 – March 20)

Call upon your network! Goal-oriented discussions get the ball rolling under the Capricorn moon. How can you support each other?

Read the full Pisces Daily Horoscope

Aries (March 21 – April 19)

Owning your value? The Capricorn moon offers clarity around personal worth. The task is to state this claim publically.

Read the full Aries Daily Horoscope

This horoscope was generated automatically using information from Sanctuary. What did you think of it? Our News Automation and AI team would love to hear from you. Take this survey and share your feedback with us.



Source link

Scientists turn lead into gold for a second, what CERN’s breakthrough means for gold lovers |


Scientists turn lead into gold for a second, what CERN's breakthrough means for gold lovers

For centuries, gold has been the stuff of dreams. From ancient kings to medieval alchemists, the idea of turning base metals into gold symbolised ultimate power, wealth, and mastery over nature. Now, in the age of particle physics, that fantasy has brushed reality. At CERN’s Large Hadron Collider (LHC), scientists have done the impossible, transformed lead into gold. It only lasted a nanosecond, and it yielded less than a speck, but it was real. Imagine a world where we could turn lead into gold at will. How would that reshape humanity, our values, and even our economy?

The Alchemy of the 21st century

In a groundbreaking experiment, scientists at CERN observed gold atoms forming during high-speed, near-miss collisions of lead nuclei. Unlike the poetic fire and brimstone of ancient alchemy, this transmutation was born of pure energy, photons knocking out three protons from a lead atom to create gold. It wasn’t a chemical trick; it was a nuclear metamorphosis. While the gold existed for only a blink, the achievement shows how far our understanding of matter has come. The once-magical idea of changing one element into another is now physics, not fantasy.

Gold: More than just a metal

Gold isn’t just valuable because it’s rare. It’s been a symbol of beauty, power, and permanence across cultures. From wedding rings to Olympic medals, it signifies success and sanctity. Its unique properties, resistance to tarnish, stunning luster, and malleability, make it irreplaceable. That’s why the idea of creating gold is so alluring. It’s not just about wealth. It’s about crafting the impossible. But what happens when we do the impossible?

What if we could turn lead into gold

Imagine a machine small enough to fit in a lab, yet powerful enough to strip three protons from lead and transform it into gold. Every scrapyard would become a gold mine. Jewelry stores, banks, economies, they would all tremble. Gold would lose its rarity. Prices would crash. But the implications go deeper. Who controls the machines? Would nations fight over elemental converters like they once did over oil? Or would a new golden age of equality emerge, where wealth could literally be manufactured?

The human story behind the science

This isn’t just about atoms. It’s about the people behind the discovery. Scientists like Uliana Dmitrieva and Marco Van Leeuwen, who dedicate their lives to exploring the universe’s deepest secrets, aren’t seeking gold for riches. They seek understanding. The gold produced, 86 billion atoms over three years, was barely enough to weigh, yet it taught us how matter behaves at unimaginable speeds. It’s a reminder that real treasure often lies in knowledge, not in coins.

A fragile future for big science

While CERN advances our understanding, science faces peril elsewhere. In the U.S., the National Science Foundation (NSF) faces drastic funding cuts. More than 1,400 research projects have already been defunded. If gold is the dream, science is the path, and that path is being narrowed by politics. Without investment, we risk not just losing potential discoveries but also the future scientists who will never get their chance to turn dreams into atoms.

The true value of gold

The LHC didn’t just create gold. It reminded us why gold is so valued. Not because it can be worn or traded, but because it represents what we can achieve when we dare to explore. The real magic isn’t in turning lead into treasure. It’s in the journey, the creativity, persistence, and wonder that propel us from myth to microscope. In a world where science and dreams collide, perhaps the most precious thing isn’t gold at all. It’s curiosity.





Source link

Companies Raising Prices Due to Trump’s Tariffs

0


Prices are expected to go up this year as many companies signal plans to raise them in response to President Donald Trump’s slew of tariffs.

While firms raise prices for many reasons, some were blaming price hikes on tariffs long before Trump’s so-called “Liberation Day” on April 2, during which he announced a 10% baseline tariff on imports from most countries, except Canada and Mexico, and a host of “reciprocal” tariffs on top of that.

The situation is fluid. China, for example, now faces tariffs of 30%, down from 145%, after striking a trade deal with the US that does not restore the de minimis exemption. Autos are another area of focus after Trump announced a 25% tariff on all car imports into the US, though he’s since exempted imports of cars and car parts from Mexico and Canada.

“April 2, 2025, will forever be remembered as the day American industry was reborn, the day America’s destiny was reclaimed, and the day that we began to make America wealthy again,” Trump said during his remarks.

Some economists have said that Trump’s tariffs — and the uncertainty with his overall trade policy — could lead companies to raise prices on the goods they produce. Many companies have already indicated that price hikes are coming.

Toward the end of 2024, some companies began to warn that they would consider raising prices on consumers if Trump implemented his broad tariff proposals. While it’s still possible they could absorb some of the costs of the tariffs, here are the companies that have warned of price increases in recent months.

Shein and Temu

The two Chinese retailers released almost identical notices on April 16, both reading: “Due to recent changes in global trade rules and tariffs, our operating expenses have gone up.”

“To keep offering the products you love without compromising on quality, we will be making price adjustments starting April 25, 2025,” Shein’s statement said.

Shein, a fast-fashion retailer, and Temu, a marketplace for everything from home goods to electronics, promised their US customers eight final days of low-price shopping.

In addition to hiking tariffs on Chinese imports, Trump also cracked down on the de minimis trade loophole that allowed small parcels under $800 to enter the US tax-free. Shein and Temu were large beneficiaries of this loophole.

Ford

Bloomberg reported that the automaker plans to raise prices on new gas and electric cars starting in May unless Trump gives the industry some relief from tariffs.

Ford, in a memo to dealers viewed by Bloomberg, said that the company anticipates “the need to make vehicle pricing adjustments in the future, which is expected to happen with May production.” Prices won’t change for vehicles in inventory now.

On April 14, Trump told reporters that he was contemplating a temporary tariff exemption for autos to give manufacturers more time to move production to the US — but no blanket exemption has yet been instituted.

Conagra

Conagra Brands CEO Sean Connolly told Reuters on April 3 that the food company may have to hike prices to offset the cost of tariffs on ingredients like cocoa, olive oil, palm oil, and a type of steel used for its canned products.

Connolly said that Conagra, which makes products such as Hunt’s ketchup and Chef Boyardee, imports tin plate steel for its canned food and tomatoes from Mexico.

It was too early to tell how big price hikes on the company’s food products would be, he added. During an April 3 earnings call, he stressed that the trade situation remains “volatile” and changes hourly.

Volkswagen

According to a memo first reported by Automotive News, Volkswagen said it would place an import fee on vehicles made outside of the US in response to Trump’s 25% tariff on car imports.

Kjell Gruner, Volkswagen’s North America chief executive officer, recently said the carmaker would keep prices steady through the end of May but that they could increase in June.

Best Buy

Best Buy CEO Corie Barry said during the company’s March earnings call that Trump’s tariff plans are likely to increase prices.

“Trade is critically important to our business and industry. The consumer electronic supply chain is highly global, technical and complex,” Barry said. “We expect our vendors across our entire assortment will pass along some level of tariff costs to retailers, making price increases for American consumers highly likely.”

Target

Target CEO Brian Cornell told CNBC in a March interview that Trump’s 25% tariff plan on goods from Mexico and Canada would likely result in price increases on produce.

“Those are categories where we’ll try to protect pricing, but the consumer will likely see price increases over the next couple of days,” Cornell said.

Stanley Black & Decker

Donald Allan, the CEO of the manufacturing company Stanley Black & Decker, said during a February earnings call: “Our approach to any tariff scenario will be to offset the impacts with a mix of supply chain and pricing actions, which might lag the formalization of tariffs by two to three months.”

Allan had previously told analysts in an October earnings call that the company had been evaluating “a variety of different scenarios” to plan for new tariffs under Trump.

“And obviously, coming out of the gate, there would be price increases associated with tariffs that we put into the market,” Allan said, adding that “there’s usually some type of delay given the processes that our customers have around implementing price.”

Walmart

On May 15, Walmart executives said price increases were likely to spike even higher, blaming Trump’s ongoing trade war.

“Even at the reduced levels, the higher tariffs will result in higher prices,” CEO Doug McMillon said during the company’s first quarter earnings call.

US sales were boosted by shoppers looking to beat tariff-related price hikes — but despite strong first-quarter results, Walmart’s chief financial officer, John David Rainey, said the extra costs are too great for the company to take on without passing part of the burden on to consumers.

“We’re wired for everyday low prices, but the magnitude of these increases is more than any retailer can absorb,” he said.

Columbia Sportswear

Tim Boyle, the CEO of Columbia Sportswear, told analysts on an October earnings call that the company was “very concerned about the imposition of tariffs. ” He said that while he considered Columbia adept at managing tariffs, “trade wars are not good and not easy to win.”

Boyle also told The Washington Post in October that the company was “set to raise prices.”

“It’s going to be very, very difficult to keep products affordable for Americans,” he said. He later said in a February interview with CNBC that “we need some surety about what is going to happen” before making price changes.

AutoZone

Philip Daniele, the CEO of the auto-parts company AutoZone, told analysts on a September earnings call that tariff policies had “ebbed and flowed over the years,” and if Trump implemented more tariffs, “we will pass those tariff costs back to the consumer.”

“We generally raise prices ahead of that,” Daniele said, adding that prices would gradually settle over time. “So, that’s historically what we’ve done,” he said.

A 25% tariff on car imports is expected to increase manufacturing costs by anywhere from $4,000 to $12,000.

Procter & Gamble

P&G, the consumer goods company behind brands like Tide and Charmin, is looking at raising prices on new and existing products.

CEO Jon Moeller told CNBC that price hikes are “likely.”

“We will have to pull every lever we have in our arsenal to mitigate the impact of tariffs within our cost structure and P&L,” P&G’s CFO, Andre Schulten, said on a call with reporters.

The company is evaluating “exactly what is the right plan by brand, by market, what combination of pricing, over what period of time,” Schulten added.

Ferrari

Italian luxury carmaker Ferrari said in March it’d raise prices by up to 10% on certain models imported to the US starting April 2.

The change was made “based on the preliminary information currently available regarding the introduction of import tariffs on EU cars into the USA,” the company said.

Hermès

Eric du Halgouët, executive vice president of finance at the company, told analysts on a call in April that Hermès, the luxury retailer known for its iconic Birkin handbags, hadn’t yet been impacted by the tariffs, but said the company would raise prices in the US in May.

“The price increase that we’re going to implement will be just for the US. Since it’s aimed at offsetting the increase in tariffs, that only applies to the American market,” du Halgouët said on the call.

Nintendo

While Nintendo’s highly anticipated Switch 2 console won’t see a price hike over tariffs, Nintendo said accessories for the Switch 2 “will experience price adjustments from those announced on April 2 due to changes in market conditions.”

“Other adjustments to the price of any Nintendo product are also possible in the future depending on market conditions,” the company added in its announcement.

The company also delayed preorders for the Switch 2 in the wake of the tariffs.

How have prices affected you? Reach out to cboudreau@businessinsider.com.





Source link

FACT FOCUS: Trump claims the US is the only country with birthright citizenship. It’s not

0


As the Supreme Court prepared to hear arguments Thursday on whether to allow President Donald Trump’s restrictions on birthright citizenship to take effect, he falsely claimed on Truth Social that the United States is the only country that offers such a right.

Trump signed an executive order on Jan. 20, the first day of his second term, that would deny citizenship to children who are born to people who are living in the U.S. illegally or temporarily. It has been put on nationwide holds by lower court orders.

The administration is now appealing, on an emergency basis, the authority of individual judges to issue these rulings, known as nationwide, or universal, injunctions. The constitutionality of the executive order itself is not yet before the court.

Here’s a closer look at the facts.

TRUMP, discussing birthright citizenship in a Truth Social post: “The United States of America is the only Country in the World that does this, for what reason, nobody knows.”

THE FACTS: This is not true. About 30 countries, including the U.S., offer unconditional birthright citizenship, according to the CIA World Factbook and the Library of Congress. Birthright citizenship was enshrined in the Constitution after the Civil War to ensure that formerly enslaved people would be citizens.

“The statement is pretty obviously wrong,” said Ilya Somin, a professor of law at George Mason University who is an expert on constitutional law and migration rights. “Many countries have birthright citizenship, though in some of them the rules are different from those in the US.”

Birthright citizenship is a principle known as jus soli or “right of the soil.” It bases citizenship on a person being born within a country’s territory. In contrast, the principle of jus sanguinis or “right of blood” determines citizenship based on the citizenship of one’s parents or other ancestors.

Citizenship is granted to anyone born in the U.S., regardless of the parents’ immigration status. Only children of diplomats, who have allegiance to another government, and of enemies present in the U.S. during hostile occupation do not qualify. Those born to parents of sovereign Native American tribes were also excluded until the Indian Citizenship Act of 1924.

Most countries with unconditional birthright citizenship, among them Canada and Mexico, are concentrated in the Americas. The rest are in Africa and Asia. Some countries offer citizenship to those born in their territory to noncitizen parents only under certain conditions, such as the legal status of their parents or the age of the person applying for citizenship based on place of birth.

The first sentence of the Constitution’s 14th Amendment, often referred to as the Citizenship Clause, guarantees birthright citizenship. It states: “All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.”

This clause effectively overturned the notorious Dred Scott decision of 1857, in which the Supreme Court held that Black people, no matter whether or not they were enslaved, were not citizens. It was ratified, along with the rest of the 14th Amendment, in 1868 after it was passed by the Senate in 1866. The Civil War ended in 1865.

Trump’s executive order on birthright citizenship conflicts with a Supreme Court decision from 1898 that held that the Citizenship Clause made citizens of all children born on U.S. soil with narrow exceptions that are not at issue in the case currently before the court.

The justices are also considering appeals from the Trump administration on several other issues, many related to immigration.

____

Find AP Fact Checks here: https://apnews.com/APFactCheck.



Source link

For Some International Students, U.S. Dreams Dim Under Trump

0



Once drawn to American universities as havens, some students from abroad are finding the United States is not the bedrock of free speech they had expected.



Source link