Losing 3 kilos in a month might sound like a big ask, but for many, it’s a goal worth chasing. The usual advice that we get is to get moving, either by brisk walking or jogging. While both these forms of cardio are mostly recommended for weight loss, the real question is: which one works better when the goal is specific, like shedding 3 kilos in just 30 days? Here’s what we need to know about which one is better for brisk walking and jogging.
Brisk walking feels easier: But is it enough?
Brisk walking is often promoted as a gentle and also effective form of exercise, especially for beginners or those with joint concerns. It’s said to burn calories steadily without exhausting the body.Brisk walking does help in burning calories, especially when done consistently for 45 minutes to an hour daily. On average, it can burn around 250–300 calories per hour, depending on body weight and pace. But here’s the catch: it demands more time and discipline. To lose 3 kilos (around 23,000 calories) in a month, walking alone might fall short unless it’s backed by a calorie-controlled diet. For those with a slower metabolism, even an hour of brisk walking daily might just maintain the current weight, not reduce it.
Jogging burns more; but it’s not for everyone
Jogging is often seen as the go-to for serious weight loss. Many believe it burns double the calories of walking and accelerates fat loss.
This apart, exercise too can help with your weight loss goals
Jogging indeed burns more, almost 500–600 calories per hour. That makes it more efficient for losing weight in a shorter time frame. However, it comes with its own drawbacks. For someone not used to intense movement, jogging can cause muscle fatigue, joint strain, and even burnout after a week. And let’s not forget, the more intense the exercise, the higher the risk of giving up halfway through the month.So while jogging may look like the shortcut, it’s not sustainable for everyone, and that matters more than it seems.
What really matters?
This is where things get real. Studies show that consistent calorie burn, even if it’s moderate, wins over inconsistent high-intensity sessions. So, if a person can brisk walk every single day, clocking 10,000 to 12,000 steps, the long-term result might be better than jogging thrice a week followed by days of muscle pain.Consistency also builds routine, which triggers better hormone regulation, especially the ones that control appetite, metabolism, and fat storage.
Role of heart rate
Brisk walking keeps the heart rate at about 50–60% of the maximum, while jogging pushes it to 70–85%. The body burns a higher percentage of fat at moderate intensity; this is called the “fat-burning zone.” That means brisk walking, when done long enough, actually utilises more fat for energy than jogging, which relies more on carbohydrates.Recent findings suggest that moderate-intensity cardio (like walking fast) maintains fat metabolism better over time than high-intensity sessions that drain glycogen stores and leave the body craving food. So the after-burn might not be as helpful if the appetite spikes afterwards.
Weight loss also depends on muscle preservation
Intense cardio, especially jogging without strength training, can cause muscle loss. And muscle burns more calories at rest. Losing muscle mass while trying to lose fat might backfire, slowing down the metabolism in the long run.Brisk walking, being gentler, preserves muscle mass better, especially when combined with light bodyweight exercises. That means more fat is lost without losing strength.Here’s what’s often ignored: psychological fatigue. Jogging, while effective, can be mentally exhausting, especially for someone not used to pushing the limits. Brisk walking, on the other hand, feels more natural. It can be meditative, social, and even enjoyable. That enjoyment can make or break the 1-month commitment.One behavioural study from Stanford University found that people stuck longer to walking-based routines than jogging-based ones. That means better chances of actually reaching that 3 kg goal, and staying there.
